ETH Zürich Advances Quantum Photonics with Swabian Instruments' Time Taggers

by Zeynab Tavakoli | on 10 June 2026

Two green thin-film lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits mounted on copper-cornered Printed Circuit Boards with silver clamps and Flexible Printed Circuit connectors, used for generating, distributing, and measuring time-bin entangled photon pairs in quantum photonics research. (Image credit: Dr. Robert Chapman, ETH Zürich)
Two thin-film lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits designed for generating, distributing, and measuring time-bin entangled photon pairs, a key building block in quantum research. (Image credit: Dr. Robert Chapman, ETH Zürich)

Prof. Rachel Grange leads a research group at ETH Zürich focused on building quantum photonic integrated circuits using the lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) platform, a material that combines strong nonlinear optical properties with the ability to integrate many optical components on a single centimeter-scale chip.

The group’s focus areas include photon correlation analysis and quantum computing. Their experiments involve generating pairs of entangled photons at 1550 nm, the standard telecom wavelength for low-loss transmission over optical fibers, using spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC). In a recent publication in npj Quantum Information 1, the team demonstrated the generation and tomography of time-bin entangled Bell states on a lithium niobate chip, marking an important step toward practical experimental setup. At the heart of these experiments is Swabian Instruments’ Time Taggers, which handles the precise timing and correlation measurements the work depends on.

The Challenge and The Solution: Time Tagger at the Core of the Setup

Time-bin entanglement encodes quantum information in the arrival time of photons, specifically, whether a photon arrives in an “early” or “late” time slot. In setup developed by Dr. Robert Chapman and Dr. Giovanni Finco, these two time bins are separated by just 220 picoseconds. To reliably distinguish them, every part of the detection chain needs to be fast and precise.

The team uses a pulsed 775 nm laser as both the pump for photon pair generation and as a timing reference. The generated photon pairs at 1550 nm are detected by superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs). Any timing uncertainty from the detectors, the clock signal, or the time tagger accumulates and can make it impossible to separate the early and late time-bin events.

Beyond raw timing precision, the group uses 16 SNSPDs distributed across 6 parallel experiments to automate complex measurement routines, and keep data rates manageable when working with high-speed clock signals.

Dr. Chapman and Dr. Finco integrated Swabian Instruments’ Time Tagger Ultra and Time Tagger X into their lab. The Time Tagger’s low timing jitter meant it did not introduce significant uncertainty into their measurements, a critical requirement when working with 220 ps time-bin separations. The setup works as follows: the pulsed pump laser serves as a timing clock. Fiber optic components split the laser pulses to define time-bin qubits, which are then coupled into the lithium niobate chip. The generated photon pairs are filtered and routed to SNSPDs, and all detection events are recorded by the Time Tagger with sub-nanosecond resolution.

The experimental setup for time-bin entangled photon pair generation and analysis. A pulsed 775 nm laser running at 80 MHz serves as both the pump and timing clock. The laser passes through an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer formed by two 50:50 beam splitters and a fiber delay loop, introducing a time delay, creating early and late time-bin pulse pairs. The pulse pairs are coupled into a lithium niobate photonic integrated circuit, controlled by a voltage controller for on-chip phase adjustment. Generated photon pairs at 1550 nm exit the chip and pass through long-pass filters and a bandpass filter for pump suppression and spectral selection. Photons are then detected by superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, with all detection events recorded and analyzed by Swabian Instruments' Time Tagger connected to a computer.(Credit: adapted from Finco et al., npj Quantum Information (2024), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00925-7).
Experimental setup for time-bin entangled photon pair generation and analysis. A pulsed 775 nm laser running at 80 MHz serves as both the pump and timing clock. The laser passes through an unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer, formed by two 50:50 beam splitters and a fiber delay loop, which splits each pulse into an early and a late time-bin pair separated by a delay τ. These pulse pairs are coupled into a lithium niobate photonic integrated circuit, where spontaneous parametric down-conversion generates entangled photon pairs at 1550 nm. A voltage controller adjusts the on-chip phase shifters. The generated photons exit the chip, pass through long-pass filters (LPFs) and a bandpass filter (BPF) for pump suppression and spectral selection, and are then detected by SNSPDs. All detection events are recorded and analyzed by Swabian Instruments’ Time Tagger. (Credit: adapted from Finco et al., npj Quantum Information (2024), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00925-7).

How Time Tagger Made a Difference: Visualizing the full quantum state

One of the most useful features for the ETH team was the 2D histogram capability. Standard triple-coincidence measurements can miss certain correlations because they collapse the data into a single dimension, leading some events to overlap and become indistinguishable.

As Dr. Chapman explained:

“The 2D histogram feature of the TT allowed us to visualize the complete two-qubit state and to distinguish all the possible experimental outcomes that are governed by probabilistic photon splitting.”

By visualizing coincidence events in two dimensions, signal and idler photon arrival times both referenced to the pump clock, the team could see the full structure of the quantum state at once, and then extract any one-dimensional projection they needed for comparison with other works. Using the Time Tagger, the team successfully generated and characterized time-bin entangled Bell states on a lithium niobate photonic chip, a result published in npj Quantum Information in 2024 and a follow up experiment was presented at CLEO Europe in 2025 2. The 2D histogram measurements provided a complete picture of the quantum correlations, going beyond what is typically reported in similar experiments.

The 2D histogram feature is also central to measuring the joint spectral intensity (JSI) of photon-pairs generated by SPDC. In the group of Prof. Grange, several experiments have exploited this approach using dispersive optical fiber and low loss photon detection to record the JSI with high precision 3 4.

Two-panel figure showing coincidence measurements of time-bin entangled photon pairs. Panel (a) shows a 2D coincidence histogram with signal delay on the x-axis and idler delay on the y-axis, both ranging from approximately -440 to +440 picoseconds. A color scale from 0 to 1 represents normalized coincidence counts. Five main coincidence peaks appear at positions corresponding to early-early, early-late, on-time, late-early, and late-late photon arrival combinations, each highlighted with a solid blue ellipse. Dashed red ellipses mark additional expected peak positions with no or low counts. Marginal histograms along the top and right edges show the one-dimensional projections of the 2D distribution. Panel (b) shows the corresponding one-dimensional triple coincidence measurement, with five labeled peaks identifying the quantum states. The central peak is the tallest, representing the interference of the on-time quantum state. (Credit: adapted from Finco et al., npj Quantum Information (2024), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00925-7).
Two-dimensional and one-dimensional coincidence measurements of time-bin entangled photon pairs. Panel (a) shows the full 2D coincidence histogram between the signal and idler photon detection channels, both referenced to the pump clock. Each of the five solid blue ellipses marks a distinct measurement outcome corresponding to a combination of early (E), on-time (T), or late (L) photon arrivals. Dashed red ellipses indicate expected peak positions where no significant counts were observed. The marginal histograms on the top and right edges show the one-dimensional projections along each axis. Panel (b) shows the collapsed one-dimensional triple coincidence measurement, where certain outcomes from panel (a) merge and can no longer be distinguished independently; for example, |ET⟩ and |TE⟩ appear as a single combined peak. The central |TT⟩ peak corresponds to the interfering on-time quantum state. This comparison illustrates the advantage of the 2D visualization: it preserves the full information of the quantum state, which is lost when projecting onto a single axis. (Credit: adapted from Finco et al., npj Quantum Information (2024), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00925-7).

Running parallel, automated experiments

The group operates 16 SNSPDs across 6 different experiments simultaneously. The Time Tagger Server feature allows multiple experiments to share access to the same instrument over the network, removing the bottleneck of having to dedicate hardware to a single setup. The team also built automated control routines using the Time Tagger’s Python API. These routines simultaneously drove the on-chip optical phase shifters via custom electronics and recorded triple-coincidence photon events, enabling long, fully automated measurement runs without manual intervention. Another key capability was conditional filtering: the Time Tagger can filter time tags based on whether specific events occur, which significantly reduces the data rate when using high-speed clock signals. As Dr. Chapman noted:

“The possibility of conditional filtering based on the occurrence of certain events allows us to reduce the data rate, which can easily diverge when using high-speed clock signals. Hence, it allows us to run experiments in parallel without risking compromising another measurement in case of overflow. The implemented functions enable sophisticated measurements that would be more complicated when handling time stamps by oneself.”

The combination of low jitter, network sharing, Python programmability, and conditional filtering allowed the group to run complex, multi-experiment workflows that would have been significantly harder to manage otherwise. The group is now continuing this work, with plans to develop a prototype system based on their recent publication results, which they intend to test on deployed fiber networks, a significant step toward real-world infrastructure.

“The Time Tagger is highly programmable, intuitive to use, and supports our parallel, automated experiments. We recommend it to any lab working with high-speed quantum photonics.”

References


  1. Finco, G., Miserocchi, F., Maeder, A. et al. Time-bin entangled Bell state generation and tomography on thin-film lithium niobate. npj Quantum Inf 10, 135 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00925-7 ↩︎

  2. Finco, G. et al. An Integrated Photonic Circuit on Thin-Film Lithium Niobate for Time-Bin Quantum Information Processing. CLEO/Europe 2025 (2025), paper eb_8_4 ↩︎

  3. Kellner, J., Sabatti, A., Kuttner, T., Chapman, R. J. & Grange, R. Counter-propagating spontaneous parametric down-conversion source in lithium niobate on insulator. Optica Quantum, OPTICAQ 4, 100–107 (2026). ↩︎

  4. Kuttner, T., Sabatti, A., Kellner, J., Grange, R. & Chapman, R. J. Heralded quantum interference in integrated lithium niobate nanophotonics. Optica Quantum, OPTICAQ 4, 121–129 (2026). ↩︎

Cookie Policy
We use third party service providers, like Freshworks Inc ("Freshworks") to enable interaction with you on our website and/or our product. As a data processor acting on our behalf, Freshworks automatically receives and records certain information of yours like device model, IP address, the type of browser being used and usage pattern through cookies and browser settings. Freshworks performs analytics on such data on our behalf which helps us improve our service to you. You can read about the cookies Freshworks' sets in their cookie policy here.